The McCloud Remedy and Pension Loss Claims: Why It Matters for Expert Witness Calculations

The McCloud remedy, the government’s solution to age discrimination arising from certain public sector pension reforms in the UK, continues to have a significant impact on pension loss calculations in personal injury, clinical negligence and employment litigation. Although the legal principles are now established, the practical implications remain anything but straightforward.

As financial expert witnesses, we continue to see cases in which the McCloud remedy materially affects the value of pension loss and once-reasonable assumptions no longer produce an accurate result. This article recaps the McCloud and Sargeant judgements and explains how the reactive legislation affects expert witness and pension loss calculations.

What Is the McCloud Remedy?

The McCloud remedy is government legislation to remove unlawful age discrimination from public sector pension schemes following the 2015 reforms. At the time, transitional protections allowed many older members to remain in their existing schemes while younger members were moved directly into the reformed arrangements and therefore disadvantaged.

The decisions affected numerous public sector pension schemes, including those covering:

  • NHS staff
  • Teachers
  • Firefighters
  • Police officers
  • Civil servants
  • Members of the judiciary
  • Armed Forces personnel

Employment tribunal claims were brought by members of the judges’ (McCloud judgement) and firefighters’ (Sargeant judgement) pension schemes. In a landmark ruling, the Court of Appeal subsequently found that these transitional protections amounted to unlawful age discrimination because they favoured older members without sufficient justification.

In response, the government introduced the McCloud remedy to remove the discriminatory treatment across all public sector schemes and give eligible members the opportunity to receive whichever pension benefits are more favourable for the remedy period (1 April 2015 to 31 March 2022). This is commonly referred to as the Deferred Choice Underpin (DCU).

While this helps correct historical discrimination, it adds complexity to valuing future pension benefits and calculating pension losses in the UK for litigation purposes.

How Does the McCloud Remedy Affect Pension Loss Claims?

This is where the issue becomes particularly important for solicitors and the Courts. A pension loss calculation is only as reliable as the assumptions underpinning it. For claimants who are members of the reformed public sector pension schemes, the expert financial witness must consider:

  • Whether the McCloud remedy applies
  • Which pension arrangement is likely to produce the greater benefit
  • How future career progression affects that outcome
  • Whether different employment scenarios alter the preferred option
  • The impact on retirement benefits, ill-health retirement and survivor benefits where relevant

There is rarely a ‘standard’ answer as to how the McCloud remedy affects pension loss claims. Each case depends on the individual’s employment history, age, salary progression, retirement assumptions and likely future career path.

Why Expert Analysis Matters

The McCloud remedy cannot be applied to pension loss claims as a blanket adjustment. Instead, expert financial witnesses must perform detailed ‘better-off’ modelling to determine which pension benefits should be reflected within the loss calculations in several alternative career scenarios.

For example, a claimant who remains in employment may benefit from one outcome, whereas an individual forced to retire early because of injury or illness may achieve a different result. It’s only once we have completed these comparisons that we can form an accurate opinion on the claimant’s pension losses in the UK.

Examples of McCloud Remedy Pitfalls

Our independent expert witnesses at Paladin Experts regularly encounter cases where:

  • The McCloud remedy has been overlooked entirely
  • Incorrect pension scheme assumptions have been used
  • Legacy and reformed benefits have been mixed incorrectly
  • Career progression assumptions are inconsistent with the pension calculations
  • Pension loss has been calculated without considering the claimant’s likely DCU outcome

These issues can have a significant impact on the overall valuation of a claim.

Our Approach

At Paladin Experts, we specialise in preparing independent expert witness reports involving complex pension loss calculations. Our reports consider the relevant pension legislation, the McCloud remedy, future career scenarios and the financial evidence to provide robust, transparent calculations suitable for litigation. Whether we are formally instructed as an independent financial expert witness or engaged on an advisory basis to assist solicitors, our objective is always the same: to ensure pension losses in the UK are calculated fairly.

Need Assistance with a McCloud Remedy Pension Loss Calculation?

If your case involves a member of a reformed UK public sector pension scheme, it is important to ensure the McCloud remedy has been considered appropriately. To discuss a case, or arrange assistance with pension loss calculations or expert witness evidence, please get in touch with our team.

Related Articles

Join our Mailing List

Follow Us

What our clients say

  • We first came across Steve and the Paladin Group due to a medical negligence claim. Our solicitors advised us to open a Personal Injury Trust account so that any award would be protected from affecting my wife’s benefits. Steve responded quickly, talked us through the purpose of the account, and had everything set up in no time.

    But it didn’t end there. I explained to Steve the level of benefit my wife was receiving and how we felt something wasn’t right but didn’t know where to start. He suggested we speak with Jane.

    Jane reached out straight away, visited us, and went through my wife’s current award and the issues we were facing. She immediately recognised that the benefit level was incorrect. She helped us submit a mandatory reconsideration (which was rejected), and then advised that the next step was to appeal to a tribunal. We followed her guidance.

    It was the best decision we made. The tribunal not only agreed with us but also increased the period of backpay owed to my wife.

    We cannot thank Steve or Jane enough for their hard work, honesty, and the speed at which they helped us. We would highly recommend them and the Paladin Group.

    Ian & Lyndsey

    Ian & Lyndsey

  • “Jane was Amazing! I am due to get my first benefits payment shortly. Completing the forms with Jane’s help was much better than trying to do alone as she is so on the ball and just made the whole process much easier and less stressful”

    LM

    Paladin Client

  • “We instructed Jeremy to provide expert evidence about the proper level of commission for introductions to be made to a financial adviser or pension fund as part of a multi-party fraud claim in the High Court of England and Wales. Jeremy was enthusiastic and passionate from the outset: from the initial conversation he started undertaking research, checking information and coming up with ideas about the best way to demonstrate and present his evidence. ”

    LF

    Testimonial from Partner at a London firm

  • “I would not hesitate to recommend Stephen as an expert witness, in particular advising on the form of the award in multi-million pound claims. Stephen recently assisted on the day of a Joint Settlement Meeting, being on the phone and at the end of emails to provide a steer on the choice between a lump sum and a Periodical Payments Order in a multi-million pound claim. He also helped with cashflow modelling on lump sum awards. The work he did to help my client with the choice between the form of the award and to help me and Counsel advise on settlement offers was absolutely invaluable.”

    AH

    Testimonial from Partner Personal Injury

  • “Stephen is an excellent expert. His advice is clear and demonstrates his knowledge and experience. Stephen is an excellent communicator and has a detailed understanding of the litigation process. Most importantly, Stephen is excellent with clients. I would have no hesitation in recommending Stephen for any clinical negligence claim.”

    KP

    Testimonial from partner at a large law firm

  • “lan has been extremely helpful at providing a comprehensive report on a PPO at extremely short notice. He was very approachable and my client immediately felt comfortable with his advice. He made himself available for us at very short notice to advise on investments during the course of a joint settlement meeting. He is extremely competent and efficient. I would highly recommend his services.”

    Testimonial about Ian MacKendrick

    Partner of law firm

ALL REVIEWS