Retirement Age Assumptions in Personal Injury Claims: What Difference Can They Make?

Retirement age assumptions can have a significant impact on personal injury claims, affecting loss of earnings, pension loss and dependency claims. This article explores why retirement age matters, the evidence experts consider and how different working-life assumptions can change the value of a claim.

When dealing with personal injury claims, many solicitors ask how much difference the expected retirement age makes. The short answer is: a significant difference. In personal injury cases, retirement age is a key assumption underpinning the calculation of future loss of earnings, pension loss, loss of dependency and lost years claims.

Because many professionals now work well beyond State Pension Age, whether due to financial necessity or personal choice, it is vital to consider how long each individual claimant might have continued working if not for the injury. Everyone is different and deserves a bespoke financial approach to their personal injury claim.

In this article, Chartered Financial Planner Ian MacKendrick breaks down why hypothetical retirement age matters, how State Pension Age factors into claims and the evidence that independent financial experts consider when preparing reports.

Why Expected Retirement Age Matters

Extending a claimant’s anticipated working life can have a substantial impact on the valuation of a personal injury claim and loss of earnings. In many careers, salary is highest in the final years before retirement. Losing those years can therefore have a disproportionate effect on the overall value of the claim.

For example, a later retirement date than normal may increase:

Future loss of earnings
  • Pension loss
  • Employer pension contributions
  • Loss of dependency
  • Claims involving lost years
  • Additional tax relief calculations 

There is no universal retirement age that applies to every claimant. While retiring at 67 may be entirely realistic for one individual, working until 75 may be more likely for another. It is always important to ensure that the evidence supports retirement age assumptions in personal injury cases.

Personal Injury Claims for Loss of Pension

Projecting a longer working life also increases pension losses. For members of defined contribution pension schemes, additional years of contributions and investment growth can produce a much larger pension fund, resulting in:

  • Greater retirement income
  • A larger tax-free lump sum
  • Increased financial security throughout retirement

For members of defined benefit pension schemes, working beyond normal retirement age can also increase pension benefits, depending on the scheme rules and any late retirement enhancements that apply. When calculating how much a claimant would have received when they retired, each pension scheme needs to be assessed individually.

Increase in State Pension Losses

Financial analysis should also include State Pension entitlement, which is a taxable government payment based on your National Insurance (NI) record.

When unable to work due to injury or long-term illness, many claimants cannot earn NI contributions, and not all state benefits provide NI credits. If those contribution gaps are not identified, the claimant could ultimately receive a reduced State Pension. In some cases, the financial impact can be worth thousands of pounds over the course of retirement.

Also consider that State Pension Age has increased significantly over the last two decades and continues to change. Current legislation provides for further increases over time, and future governments may make additional changes as life expectancy, demographics and public finances evolve.

For this reason, relying solely on today’s State Pension Age is rarely sufficient when projecting a claimant’s likely working life decades into the future. The appropriate retirement age assumption for a personal injury claim should always be based on their individual circumstances rather than a standard retirement age.

How Are Personal Injury Claims Calculated?

When preparing reports and helping to calculate personal injury claim valuations, independent expert witnesses consider factors such as:

  • The claimant’s age
  • Occupation and career path
  • Health before the accident
  • Earnings history
  • Previous retirement intentions
  • Employer practices
  • Pension arrangements
  • Any evidence suggesting they intended to continue working beyond State Pension Age

In many cases, we model multiple retirement scenarios so the Court can clearly understand how different assumptions affect the overall value of the claim.

How Paladin Experts Can Help

At Paladin Experts, we prepare independent expert witness reports covering:

If you are unsure whether a later retirement age is supportable in one of your cases, we are always happy to discuss the evidence and provide an initial view before formal instruction. To discuss a case or obtain an initial view on retirement age assumptions in personal injury cases, please get in touch with our expert team.

Related Articles

Need Advice On A Complex Settlement?

We are vastly experienced independent experts. We have acted as expert witnesses on thousands of occasions and pride ourselves as accurate, honest & reliable. We are instructed jointly by claimants, respondents & defendants and have panel status on over 40 UK expert witness panels.

What our clients say

  • We first came across Steve and the Paladin Group due to a medical negligence claim. Our solicitors advised us to open a Personal Injury Trust account so that any award would be protected from affecting my wife’s benefits. Steve responded quickly, talked us through the purpose of the account, and had everything set up in no time.

    But it didn’t end there. I explained to Steve the level of benefit my wife was receiving and how we felt something wasn’t right but didn’t know where to start. He suggested we speak with Jane.

    Jane reached out straight away, visited us, and went through my wife’s current award and the issues we were facing. She immediately recognised that the benefit level was incorrect. She helped us submit a mandatory reconsideration (which was rejected), and then advised that the next step was to appeal to a tribunal. We followed her guidance.

    It was the best decision we made. The tribunal not only agreed with us but also increased the period of backpay owed to my wife.

    We cannot thank Steve or Jane enough for their hard work, honesty, and the speed at which they helped us. We would highly recommend them and the Paladin Group.

    Ian & Lyndsey

    Ian & Lyndsey

  • “Jane was Amazing! I am due to get my first benefits payment shortly. Completing the forms with Jane’s help was much better than trying to do alone as she is so on the ball and just made the whole process much easier and less stressful”

    LM

    Paladin Client

  • “We instructed Jeremy to provide expert evidence about the proper level of commission for introductions to be made to a financial adviser or pension fund as part of a multi-party fraud claim in the High Court of England and Wales. Jeremy was enthusiastic and passionate from the outset: from the initial conversation he started undertaking research, checking information and coming up with ideas about the best way to demonstrate and present his evidence. ”

    LF

    Testimonial from Partner at a London firm

  • “I would not hesitate to recommend Stephen as an expert witness, in particular advising on the form of the award in multi-million pound claims. Stephen recently assisted on the day of a Joint Settlement Meeting, being on the phone and at the end of emails to provide a steer on the choice between a lump sum and a Periodical Payments Order in a multi-million pound claim. He also helped with cashflow modelling on lump sum awards. The work he did to help my client with the choice between the form of the award and to help me and Counsel advise on settlement offers was absolutely invaluable.”

    AH

    Testimonial from Partner Personal Injury

  • “Stephen is an excellent expert. His advice is clear and demonstrates his knowledge and experience. Stephen is an excellent communicator and has a detailed understanding of the litigation process. Most importantly, Stephen is excellent with clients. I would have no hesitation in recommending Stephen for any clinical negligence claim.”

    KP

    Testimonial from partner at a large law firm

  • “lan has been extremely helpful at providing a comprehensive report on a PPO at extremely short notice. He was very approachable and my client immediately felt comfortable with his advice. He made himself available for us at very short notice to advise on investments during the course of a joint settlement meeting. He is extremely competent and efficient. I would highly recommend his services.”

    Testimonial about Ian MacKendrick

    Partner of law firm

ALL REVIEWS